Manifesto for a Post-Materialist Science

Prelude

The following "Manifesto for a Post-Materialist Science" is NOT my original work. Its origin is explained in its first paragraph. I chose to publish it as a guest-authored post because it speaks with academic authority to the points I make in my "Open Mind, Fearless Mind" post, and underscores sentiments I express on the Resources page:

"Being yourself is rooted in living fearlessly. Living fearlessly begins with understanding, truly knowing, that "you," your essence, transcends your physical body and brain. This information will come to life when you choose to explore it with an open mind. It is your entree into knowing. It is your antidote to fear."

I encourage you to take some time with this. Schools and universities around the world are embracing and expanding consciousness studies and related healing arts. They are approaching the topic with open minds and advanced thinking in the areas of modern physics and quantum mechanics supported by overwhelming, undeniable, and exponentially growing and aligned empirical evidence. Schools in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Norway, Japan, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States are dedicated to, or have researchers or departments or programs focused in this domain of knowledge and understanding. Among the very long list of these schools, some notable mainstream institutions include Columbia and the Universities of Arizona, Derby, Edinburgh, Gothenburg, Greenwich, São Paulo, Virginia and York.

The italicized bolding throughout is mine to facilitate a scan of the material.


Manifesto for a Post-Materialist Science


We are a group of internationally known scientists, from a variety of scientific fields (biology, neuroscience, psychology, medicine, psychiatry), who participated in an international summit on post-materialist science, spirituality and society. The summit was co-organized by Gary E. Schwartz, PhD and Mario Beauregard, PhD, the University of Arizona, and Lisa Miller, PhD, Columbia University. This summit was held at Canyon Ranch in Tucson, Arizona, on February 7- 9, 2014. Our purpose was to discuss the impact of the materialist ideology on science and the emergence of a post-materialist paradigm for science, spirituality, and society. We have come to the following conclusions:

 

1. The modern scientific worldview is predominantly predicated on assumptions that are closely associated with classical physics. Materialism—the idea that matter is the only reality—is one of these assumptions. A related assumption is reductionism, the notion that complex things can be understood by reducing them to the interactions of their parts, or to simpler or more fundamental things such as tiny material particles.

2. During the 19th century, these assumptions narrowed, turned into dogmas, and coalesced into an ideological belief system that came to be known as “scientific materialism.” This belief system implies that the mind is nothing but the physical activity of the brain, and that our thoughts cannot have any effect upon our brains and bodies, our actions, and the physical world.

3. The ideology of scientific materialism became dominant in academia during the 20th century. So dominant that a majority of scientists started to believe that it was based on established empirical evidence, and represented the only rational view of the world.

4. Scientific methods based upon materialistic philosophy have been highly successful in not only increasing our understanding of nature but also in bringing greater control and freedom through advances in technology.

5. However, the nearly absolute dominance of materialism in the academic world has seriously constricted the sciences and hampered the development of the scientific study of mind and spirituality. Faith in this ideology, as an exclusive explanatory framework for reality, has compelled scientists to neglect the subjective dimension of human experience. This has led to a severely distorted and impoverished understanding of ourselves and our place in nature.

6. Science is first and foremost a non-dogmatic, open-minded method of acquiring knowledge about nature through the observation, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena. Its methodology is not synonymous with materialism and should not be committed to any particular beliefs, dogmas, or ideologies.

7. At the end of the nineteenth century, physicists discovered empirical phenomena that could not be explained by classical physics. This led to the development, during the 1920s and early 1930s, of a revolutionary new branch of physics called quantum mechanics (QM). QM has questioned the material foundations of the world by showing that atoms and subatomic particles are not really solid objects—they do not exist with certainty at definite spatial locations and definite times. Most importantly, QM explicitly introduced the mind into its basic conceptual structure since it was found that particles being observed and the observer—the physicist and the method used for observation—are linked. According to one interpretation of QM, this phenomenon implies that the consciousness of the observer is vital to the existence of the physical events being observed, and that mental events can affect the physical world. The results of recent experiments support this interpretation. These results suggest that the physical world is no longer the primary or sole component of reality, and that it cannot be fully understood without making reference to the mind.

8. Psychological studies have shown that conscious mental activity can causally influence behavior, and that the explanatory and predictive value of agentic factors (e.g. beliefs, goals, desires and expectations) is very high. Moreover, research in psychoneuroimmunology indicates that our thoughts and emotions can markedly affect the activity of the physiological systems (e.g., immune, endocrine, cardiovascular) connected to the brain. In other respects, neuroimaging studies of emotional self-regulation, psychotherapy, and the placebo effect demonstrate that mental events significantly influence the activity of the brain.

9. Studies of the so-called "psi phenomena" indicate that we can sometimes receive meaningful information without the use of ordinary senses, and in ways that transcend the habitual space and time constraints. Furthermore, psi research demonstrates that we can mentally influence— at a distance—physical devices and living organisms (including other human beings). Psi research also shows that distant minds may behave in ways that are nonlocally correlated, i.e. the correlations between distant minds are hypothesized to be unmediated (they are not linked to any known energetic signal), unmitigated (they do not degrade with increasing distance), and immediate (they appear to be simultaneous). These events are so common that they cannot be viewed as anomalous nor as exceptions to natural laws, but as indications of the need for a broader explanatory framework that cannot be predicated exclusively on materialism.

10. Conscious mental activity can be experienced in clinical death during a cardiac arrest (this is what has been called a "near-death experience" [NDE]). Some near-death experiencers (NDErs) have reported veridical out-of-body perceptions (i.e. perceptions that can be proven to coincide with reality) that occurred during cardiac arrest. NDErs also report profound spiritual experiences during NDEs triggered by cardiac arrest. It is noteworthy that the electrical activity of the brain ceases within a few seconds following a cardiac arrest.

11. Controlled laboratory experiments have documented that skilled research mediums (people who claim that they can communicate with the minds of people who have physically died) can sometimes obtain highly accurate information about deceased individuals. This further supports the conclusion that mind can exist separate from the brain.

12. Some materialistically inclined scientists and philosophers refuse to acknowledge these phenomena because they are not consistent with their exclusive conception of the world. Rejection of post-materialist investigation of nature or refusal to publish strong science findings supporting a post-materialist framework are antithetical to the true spirit of scientific inquiry, which is that empirical data must always be adequately dealt with. Data which do not fit favored theories and beliefs cannot be dismissed a priori. Such dismissal is the realm of ideology, not science.

13. It is important to realize that psi phenomena, NDEs in cardiac arrest, and replicable evidence from credible research mediums, appear anomalous only when seen through the lens of materialism.

14. Moreover, materialist theories fail to elucidate how brain could generate the mind, and they are unable to account for the empirical evidence alluded to in this manifesto. This failure tells us that it is now time to free ourselves from the shackles and blinders of the old materialist ideology, to enlarge our concept of the natural world, and to embrace a post-materialist paradigm.

15. According to the post-materialist paradigm:

a) Mind represents an aspect of reality as primordial as the physical world. Mind is fundamental in the universe, i.e. it cannot be derived from matter and reduced to anything more basic.

b) There is a deep interconnectedness between mind and the physical world.

c) Mind (will/intention) can influence the state of the physical world, and operate in a nonlocal (or extended) fashion, i.e. it is not confined to specific points in space, such as brains and bodies, nor to specific points in time, such as the present. Since the mind may nonlocally influence the physical world, the intentions, emotions, and desires of an experimenter may not be completely isolated from experimental outcomes, even in controlled and blinded experimental designs.

d) Minds are apparently unbounded, and may unite in ways suggesting a unitary, One Mind that includes all individual, single minds.

e) NDEs in cardiac arrest suggest that the brain acts as a transceiver of mental activity, i.e. the mind can work through the brain, but is not produced by it. NDEs occurring in cardiac arrest, coupled with evidence from research mediums, further suggest the survival of consciousness, following bodily death, and the existence of other levels of reality that are non-physical.

f) Scientists should not be afraid to investigate spirituality and spiritual experiences since they represent a central aspect of human existence.

16. Post-materialist science does not reject the empirical observations and great value of scientific achievements realized up until now. It seeks to expand the human capacity to better understand the wonders of nature, and in the process rediscover the importance of mind and spirit as being part of the core fabric of the universe. Post-materialism is inclusive of matter, which is seen as a basic constituent of the universe.

17. The post-materialist paradigm has far-reaching implications. It fundamentally alters the vision we have of ourselves, giving us back our dignity and power, as humans and as scientists. This paradigm fosters positive values such as compassion, respect, and peace. By emphasizing a deep connection between ourselves and nature at large, the post-materialist paradigm also promotes environmental awareness and the preservation of our biosphere. In addition, it is not new, but only forgotten for four hundred years, that a lived transmaterial understanding may be the cornerstone of health and wellness, as it has been held and preserved in ancient mind-body-spirit practices, religious traditions, and contemplative approaches.

18. The shift from materialist science to post-materialist science may be of vital importance to the evolution of the human civilization. It may be even more pivotal than the transition from geocentrism to heliocentrism.

 

We invite you, scientists of the world, to read the Manifesto for a Post-Materialist Science and sign it, if you wish to show your support (see http://opensciences.org/).

* The Manifesto for a Post-Materialist Science was prepared by Mario Beauregard, PhD (University of Arizona), Gary E. Schwartz, PhD (University of Arizona), and Lisa Miller, PhD (Columbia University), in collaboration with Larry Dossey, MD, Alexander Moreira-Almeida, MD, PhD, Marilyn Schlitz, PhD, Rupert Sheldrake, PhD, and Charles Tart, PhD.

**Contact For further information, please contact Dr Mario Beauregard, Laboratory for Advances in Consciousness and Health, Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. Email: mariobeauregard@email.arizona.edu

*** We considered two ways of referring to the emerging paradigm presented in this Manifesto: the hyphenated version (post-materialism) and the non-hyphenated version (postmaterialism). The hyphenated form was selected for the sake of clarity for both scientists and lay people.

**** The Summary Report of the International Summit on Post-Materialist Science, Spirituality and Society can be found at the following address: http://opensciences.org/

Belonging

Prelude
I have little experience writing toasts, but blog posts are a different matter. Writing it in this context was effortless. Please join me now as I share the toast I delivered last night at the wedding reception for our beautiful daughter, Alicia, and her wonderful husband, and now our son-in-law, Nils. Others referred to by name here include my incredibly loving and tireless wife, Sarah, and Nils' mom and dad, Liz and Eric. I can't say enough about Nils' warmhearted and generous parents and the entire Janson family. It is truly a joy for all of us to now be part of it.


Sarah's cookie art adorns each place setting

Sarah and I arrived in San Francisco last Wednesday from the East Coast. I'm an early riser, so the time difference has extended my quiet, uninterrupted morning writing time here. That's a good thing, since weeks ago, I responded with an enthusiastic "Yes!" to Alicia's request that I give a toast to the bride and groom. So Thursday morning found me pondering, predawn, in the kitchen of our rental, beckoning words to appear on my blank screen. Wedding chores and a packed schedule back home consumed every spare moment for the weeks leading up to this evening and... well... ok, nobody's going to buy that. So I'll just admit I procrastinated. Liz claimed the same affliction for part of her preparatory chores, so we have that in common. I love Liz! But truly, I knew I would get inspired and something would germinate and grow once I planted my feet in California soil.

I said I was beckoning words. In truth, I beckon thoughts. Words flow easily for me once thoughts take up residence. To help that along, I strolled down memory lane with the beautiful slideshow Liz assembled for this reception. Opening her slideshow gallery on my Mac, picture after picture painted itself on my screen. Over two hundred in all. Over the years, our Godlove family's combined library of photographs has mushroomed to well over a hundred thousand pictures, many on film. Sarah sorted through hundreds to capture the moments telling Alicia's story here. Liz went through a similar process for Nils before she poured them all into her mental mixing bowl and lovingly blended them into the batter of memories on display tonight.

And that's when it struck me  - what each and every picture whispered, as its image passed by me and the conjured memories passed through me. I found myself reacting differently, but predictably, depending on the nature of the captured moment. The common thread? In a word, "Belonging."

Every childhood photo of Alicia and our family whisked me back, transporting me to a time and place that feels as familiar now as then. Moments that belong to me and to each of our family members. But not just moments. These are frames. Frames from movies that begin to play the instant they come forward from the picture. Movies that come to life with a flood of sights and sounds and nostalgia and emotion. Movies that play these scenes over and over again with each view.

Progressing through Liz's slideshow play, the act featuring Nils and his family took the stage. Every picture made me wonder, "Where was that taken?" "Who's that?" "Which one is Nils?" "I didn't know they made double breasted suits that small!" Every childhood picture portrayed the loving connection to and among Nils and his family. They clearly belonged to each other. But these experiences didn't belong to me. And they didn't belong to Alicia any more than hers belonged to Nils. No movie played in my mind. No surrounding sights or sounds. No context beyond the image before me. Only the curiosity and musing and transferred emotion from scenes I could relate from my own life.

Then came the college era and more recent pictures that aren't part of my experience but are clearly part of Alicia's and Nils'. I could relate to many of these photos through stories Alicia had shared over the years. They evoked curiosity and warm emotion, but not belonging. These moments belong to Alicia and Nils and their friends, many here tonight. No doubt, rich scenes begin to play for them, filling their minds and hearts with memories as they pore over the images flashing before them.

Which brings me to this evening and events leading up to it. Alicia and Nils have been together for nearly a decade, building a life of belonging to one another. But tonight, something has profoundly shifted. Something has permanently moved in the lives of not only Alicia and Nils, but in the lives of all the Jansons and Godloves. The act of loving commitment Alicia and Nils entered into has bound our families in ways I couldn't have possibly imagined. Their commitment to one another brought us together last Christmas with Liz and Eric, and again this week, even more fully with all the siblings and the loves of their lives. Pictures of and among us are no longer stills, but frames. Frames from the movie we are co-creating as a family. A family centered on, and bound, by the love and commitment of the belonging, that Alicia and Nils have for one another and all of us. 

So please, lift your glasses and let's make a memory. Let's close this scene with an act we'll all be able to conjure years from now as we look back, with warm recollection and love for this couple and the families they've joined together; and the belonging they've created for themselves, their families, and for generations of Godloves and Jansons to come.

Cheers!